There’s quite a bit of published research on appropriate training for load-bearing marches, also known as rucking.
This article will serve to summarize and interpret those military research findings to provide background for Part Two, which will discuss how to apply the findings to a ruck training program.
Rucking Basics So, what do you need to know to understand the types of training that benefit rucking? The risks involved? The basics? Here goes: The load carried by the average foot soldier in combat is very heavy. The table below is from the NATO scientific technical report on load bearing marches:
You read that correctly 40kg . . . 88 lbs . . . and the loads are not getting lighter. The same report provides the table below from Afghanistan. Note that the loads are reported in kilograms:
Foot soldiers should be trained to be able to carry, at a minimum, 40% of bodyweight efficiently, and should be able to handle up to 75% of bodyweight for short periods of time.
This type of fitness is not likely to happen without significant planning. Left on their own for program design, soldiers are not likely to build the type of fitness to accomplish this task.
Add in an M-60 or a PRC-77 and you see why us old farts learned real quick what was worth actually carrying. Sometimes that statement of charges for losing shtuff in the field ain't so bad...
...At least until I lost the hammer out of a 292 Antenna kit. Who knew those $500 hammers they told about on the news were real? (Walmart had it for $5, just had to paint it green) :)
88 pounds is no joke even with a really good quality backpack and most backpacks are definitely not good quality. I have an old school Dana Designs pack and even with a top of the line pack that much weight is significant.
Add in an M-60 or a PRC-77 and you see why us old farts learned real quick what was worth actually carrying. Sometimes that statement of charges for losing shtuff in the field ain't so bad...
...At least until I lost the hammer out of a 292 Antenna kit. Who knew those $500 hammers they told about on the news were real? (Walmart had it for $5, just had to paint it green) :)
88 pounds is no joke even with a really good quality backpack and most backpacks are definitely not good quality. I have an old school Dana Designs pack and even with a top of the line pack that much weight is significant.